OEE – DEFINING WORLD-CLASS

Manostaxx

The text that follows is owned by the site above referred.

Here is only a small part of the article, for more please follow the link

SOURCE: http://www.oee.com/world-class-oee.html

OEE is the ratio of Fully Productive Time to Planned Production Time (refer to the OEE Factors page for a graphical representation). It is calculated as the product of its three constituent factors:

 

OEE = Availability × Performance × Quality

The nature of this calculation makes achieving a high OEE score quite challenging. For example, if all three factors are 90%, the resultant OEE will only be 73%.

In practice, the generally accepted world-class goals for each factor are quite different from each other, as is shown in the image below. Note that these figures apply to discrete manufacturing (as opposed to process industries).

85% OEE is often referred to as World-Class and is based on having 90% Availability, 95% Performance, and and 99% Quality.
It is often thought that a World-Class OEE score is 85%. Don’t fixate on the absolute value of OEE, instead fixate on your ability to improve your OEE.

TPM AND WORLD-CLASS OEE

People often ask – where do these World-Class OEE numbers come from?

The answer is simple. Seiichi Nakajima led the introduction of TPM, OEE and the Six Big Losses in the early 1970s while at the Japanese Institute of Plant Maintenance. In his 1984 book, Introduction to TPM (translated to English and published in 1988 by Productivity Press), Seiichi Nakajima included the above four “world-class” numbers.

Seiichi defined these numbers, based on his practical experience, as minimums for which companies should strive. He also noted that all of the companies winning the Distinguished Plant Prize, awarded annually in Japan to plants that had successfully implemented TPM, had OEE scores in excess of 85%.

SOME PERSPECTIVE

The World-Class OEE figures are interesting and useful, but keep in mind that they have roots in a particular place (Japan), at a particular time (1970s), and in a particular industry (automotive).

The reality is that most manufacturing companies, even today, have OEE scores closer to 60%. We work with thousands of manufacturing companies, and we see more companies with OEE scores lower than 45% than companies with OEE scores higher than 85%.

The important point is – don’t fixate on the absolute value of the number. Fixate on your ability to improve that number.

Even within a manufacturing plant it can be counterproductive to set just one OEE target. For example, if you have two identical production lines but one line makes a single product and the other line makes 10 different products would you expect them to have the same OEE score? No. The line making 10 different products is likely to experience far greater Availability Loss due to Changeovers and thus a lower OEE score.

Here is another perspective:

  • If your OEE is below 40% – is an 85% target going to motivate your team?
  • If your OEE is already 85% – do you really want to stop there?

SETTING A TARGET

So how should you go about setting an OEE target?

Here is the bottom line. Set an OEE target that will drive solid, incremental improvement for your process. Each OEE target should be a stretch target that is truly achievable, preferably within three or four months.

Also, do your best to avoid comparing dissimilar processes and external benchmarks. There is only one target that really matters: the target that will drive improvement for your process.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s